A procurement team throws a small party. They’ve shaved millions off the supplier budget. The CFO beams. The board applauds. Six months later, a cyber incident or supply disruption wipes out those savings in days. The champagne glow fades.
This is not fiction. It happens every year in boardrooms that treat procurement as a hunting ground for savings instead of a safeguard for resilience. When cost reduction becomes the primary focus, resilience pays the price, especially in the case of cyber resilience.
You see it everywhere. Organizations optimize procurement to look good on quarterly slides. They negotiate the lowest price, consolidate suppliers and chase global sourcing arbitrage. It works until the unexpected hits. A ransomware attack cripples a vendor. A third-party breach compromises customer data. A geopolitical shock disrupts digital supply chains. Suddenly, losses from a fragile, unprepared ecosystem dwarf the money saved.
If you’re on a board leading finance, risk, procurement or security, the message is blunt: procurement strategies built on short-term savings erode resilience. And in an era where cyberattacks exploit every weakness, that fragility is a bet against your survival.
Here’s the arc of the problem and what you can do about it.
Why procurement prioritizes cost above all
Procurement follows the incentives you give it. And most incentives point in one direction: cut costs.
Boards demand quick wins. Shareholders watch quarterly margins. Procurement KPIs focus on negotiated savings, supplier discounts and contract efficiency. It’s a one-dimensional scoreboard. Nobody hands out trophies for resilience.
Cyber resilience rarely appears on procurement dashboards. A vendor offering cheaper cloud storage will beat a competitor with stronger cyber safeguards, simply because the first is cheaper on paper. The boardroom reinforces this blind spot. Quarterly reporting cycles reward immediate savings, not the unseen cost of risk reduction. Shareholders don’t ask if your supplier encrypts backups or patches vulnerabilities. They ask how much you shaved off the IT contract.
Global sourcing makes it worse. Firms outsource development or data processing to low-cost regions with weaker privacy laws and fragile security oversight. On spreadsheets, it looks brilliant. In practice, it’s like building your house on sand.
Procurement also operates with blind spots. A buyer can compare unit costs of servers, but rarely the supplier’s incident response maturity. Without cyber expertise at the table, decisions default to the cheapest bidder. Cost wins. Security loses.
This is how organizations become penny-wise. And as attacks multiply, it’s also how they become pound-foolish.
The hidden trade-offs with resilience
Savings don’t erase risk. They shift it. What looks efficient today becomes exposed tomorrow. Cyber resilience is often the first casualty.
Supply chain fragility: Cyber threats thrive on concentration. When procurement consolidates digital services into a single provider to save money, a single breach can have a ripple effect across your operations. Consider the numerous businesses tied to a single compromised cloud vendor, which can be cheap until an outage or ransomware campaign brings them all down.
Cybersecurity weakness: Vendors are often chosen for cost, not defense-in-depth. The “affordable” software supplier may lack basic monitoring or encryption. When attackers compromise them, your systems become collateral damage. Procurement saved a dollar but opened a door for hackers.
Operational rigidity: Cheap IT providers rarely build resilience into contracts. They don’t maintain redundant data centers. They don’t run breach simulations. They don’t guarantee recovery in hours, only in days. When ransomware strikes, you’re paying in downtime what you once saved in cost.
Cultural risks: A transactional relationship kills transparency. Vendors under constant price pressure often fail to promptly disclose near-misses. They fear contract termination. That delay costs you valuable hours in containment. Collaboration in crisis requires trust, not just a signed contract.
Procurement thinks it saved money. What it really bought was fragility disguised as efficiency.
Real-world costs of cheap procurement
The myth of cheap procurement collapses under stress. Recent history offers brutal lessons.
SolarWinds breach. Thousands of organizations relied on a cost-efficient IT supplier. Attackers slipped malicious code into its updates. Hackers compromised governments and corporations worldwide. The procurement team might have saved millions. The damage bill reached billions.
Kaseya ransomware attack. Many mid-sized businesses relied on Kaseya’s remote management tool because it was an affordable option. Attackers hijacked it, spreading ransomware across hundreds of clients. The procurement logic of a single, inexpensive tool became the weapon that attackers scaled.
Colonial Pipeline hack. A single compromised VPN account, lacking multifactor authentication, triggered the shutdown of critical infrastructure. Procurement had outsourced key systems with minimal cyber scrutiny. The real cost wasn’t the ransom. It was the systemic disruption and reputational fallout.
COVID-19 and digital fragility. Hospitals and governments scrambled to scale remote work with IT services. Many picked low-cost providers. Within months, attackers exploited weak VPNs, unpatched systems and unsecured collaboration tools. The savings turned into a wave of cyber incidents.
Automotive chip shortages meet cyber. As chip suppliers consolidated, ransomware attacks on a single manufacturer cascaded across global production. Procurement’s lean sourcing magnified the blast radius.
These are not outliers. They are the predictable outcome of ignoring cyber resilience in procurement.
Each case reveals the same truth: the resilience premium far exceeds the savings illusion. Revenue loss, regulatory fines, reputational damage, customer churn; the real bill is always larger.
How to balance cost and resilience
This is not a call to abandon savings. It’s a call to recognize that cost efficiency without cyber resilience is a false economy.
Your challenge is to redesign procurement so that cost efficiency and cyber resilience reinforce each other, rather than cancelling each other out.
Risk-based procurement
Treat procurement like risk management, not bargain hunting. Every supplier is a potential doorway into your systems. Locks, alarms and cameras are used to reinforce some doors. Others are left ajar. If you let procurement chase the lowest price without scoring those risks, you’ve just invited attackers to stroll in.
Practical steps:
Require cybersecurity due diligence in every RFP. Ask about patching frequency, incident response protocols, SOC 2/ISO 27001 certifications and zero-trust adoption.
Classify vendors by risk tier. A stationery supplier doesn’t need the same scrutiny as a cloud services provider.
Apply a minimum cyber baseline. If a vendor cannot meet basic security controls, such as MFA, encryption and vulnerability management, they should not even qualify, regardless of price.
This is not cost inflation. It’s cost prevention.
Resilience metrics
If you only measure savings, procurement will only deliver savings. Expand the scoreboard.
Resilience KPIs could include:
Mean time to detect (MTTD): How quickly does a supplier detect incidents?
Mean time to respond (MTTR): How fast do they contain breaches?
Recovery time objectives (RTOs): How quickly can systems or services be restored?
Patch management cadence: Average time to remediate critical vulnerabilities.
Disclosure speed: How fast does a vendor reports breaches or exposures?
Imagine reporting these alongside contract savings in quarterly board updates. Suddenly, procurement leaders see resilience as part of their job, not a nuisance.
Cross-functional governance
Procurement cannot navigate cyber risk alone. You need CFOs, CROs, CIOs and CISOs at the table.
The CFO ensures the business case is sound, balancing savings against potential loss exposure.
The CRO frames supplier decisions within the context of the enterprise’s risk appetite.
The CIO and CISO ensure digital suppliers meet the organization’s cyber and operational resilience standards.
Without this alignment, procurement decisions drift into cost myopia. With it, they anchor in strategy.
Strategic supplier partnerships
Relationships, not transactions, build resilience. If you treat suppliers like commodities, they will act like commodities. In a crisis, they’ll give you the bare minimum required by the contract.
An article in Procurement Magazine argues that procurement is shifting from transactional interactions toward deep supplier partnerships that emphasize trust, shared value and resilience. It demonstrates how these relationships enable procurement functions to drive innovation, manage risk and deliver lasting business impact.
If you cultivate long-term partnerships, they’ll invest in joint resilience. They’ll disclose incidents quickly. They’ll share threat intelligence. They’ll prioritize your recovery.
Concrete actions:
Sign resilience-focused SLAs covering uptime, response times and breach notification.
Hold quarterly joint security reviews.
Run joint red-team or tabletop exercises.
Establish escalation channels beyond account managers, allowing CISOs and CTOs to communicate directly during crises.
Partnerships cost more upfront. But they pay dividends when disruption strikes.
Scenario testing
Procurement decisions must survive stress tests. Don’t assume contracts will hold under pressure. Test them. Run simulations:
What happens when ransomware hits your cloud provider?
How fast does your SaaS partner notify you of an exposure?
If your outsourced developer leaks data, how quickly can you shut access down?
Can a logistics partner reroute around a cyber disruption at a port?
These tests reveal weaknesses early, when you can fix them without incurring significant consequences. They also signal to suppliers that resilience is non-negotiable.
Embedding cyber resilience into procurement culture
Changing the mindset is the hard part. Procurement has long treated cost as the hero metric. You need to reset the narrative.
Celebrate resilience wins in the same breath as cost savings.
Highlight how a supplier’s strong security posture avoided disruption.
Train procurement professionals to understand cyber basics; what MFA, patch cadence or zero trust mean in practice.
Make resilience part of career progression. Reward procurement leaders who achieve sustainable value, not just savings.
The cultural shift transforms procurement from bargain hunters into resilience builders. And that is how you make resilience sustainable.
The payoff
When procurement weaves in cyber resilience, you don’t just avoid losses; you create an advantage. You recover faster than rivals. You protect customer trust. You maintain operations when others stumble. That is not an extra cost. That is an advantage.
Resilience is not an extra cost. It’s strategic insurance. It is the reason your savings last instead of evaporating in the next breach.
Short-term procurement savings look good in board reports. But when cyber incidents strike, those savings often collapse into losses. You don’t want to be the leader explaining how millions saved turned into billions lost.
The takeaway is clear: Cost efficiency and resilience are not enemies. They are allies when appropriately governed. Procurement must evolve from cheapest supplier wins to most sustainable partner wins.
As a leader, your call is clear. Redefine procurement’s mandate. Add cyber resilience to the scoreboard. Demand metrics beyond cost. Stress-test decisions. Elevate procurement from bargain hunter to resilience builder.
Being penny-wise but pound-foolish is not just careless. It’s existential.
This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?
No Responses