Top CNAPP Vendors and Which One Should You Pick

Tags:

Key Takeaways

Modern enterprises are deploying an average of 85 SaaS applications. At the same time, they’re managing increasingly complex multi-cloud architectures. This combination creates unprecedented visibility challenges for security teams. Gartner’s latest forecast puts global cybersecurity spending at $213 billion in 2025—that’s a 10% increase from 2024’s $193.5 billion. Organizations are prioritizing unified platforms that consolidate multiple security tools into comprehensive cloud native application protection platforms.

CNAPPs represent a shift from fragmented point solutions. These integrated security platforms protect cloud native applications throughout their development lifecycle. Gartner has a prediction here too: by 2029, 40% of enterprises implementing zero trust in cloud environments will rely on advanced CNAPP capabilities for visibility and control.

Market-Leading CNAPP Vendors

Strategic advantages for comprehensive cloud security:

Unique differentiators:

Best for: Organizations requiring comprehensive cloud workload protection with minimal operational overhead and multi cloud environments coverage.

2. Wiz – Cloud Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)

Why decision makers choose Wiz CNAPP:

Best for: Organizations prioritizing rapid deployment and comprehensive cloud workload protection with agentless visibility.

3. Microsoft – Defender for Cloud

Core advantages for enterprise security:

Best for: Microsoft-centric organizations requiring seamless ecosystem integration and cloud security posture management.

4. Palo Alto Networks – Prisma Cloud

Key differentiators for comprehensive security:

Best for: Enterprises requiring comprehensive DevSecOps integration and security and compliance capabilities with AI-driven insights.

5. Orca Security – Cloud Security Platform (CNAPP)

Unique capabilities for agentless protection:

Best for: Organizations seeking minimal deployment complexity with maximum visibility across cloud native environments and automated remediation.

6. CrowdStrike – Falcon Cloud Security

Core advantages for unified protection:

Unique differentiators:

Best for: Enterprises requiring unified endpoint-to-cloud protection with identity-centric security and organizations seeking comprehensive visibility across complex multi-cloud environments with AI workloads.

Essential Evaluation Framework

Platform Consolidation Capabilities

Effective CNAPP solutions must genuinely consolidate capabilities rather than rebrand existing traditional security tools:

Deployment Architecture Decision

Agentless vs. Agent-Based vs. Hybrid Deployment:

Agentless Architecture Advantages:

Microagent Hybrid Approach Benefits:

Selection Decision Matrix

Selection CriteriaPrimary NeedRecommended SolutionKey Advantage

Hybrid Cloud Architecture with High Container UsageOrganizations running extensive containerized applications across multiple clouds requiring both agentless CSPM and deep runtime protectionFidelis Security – Halo® PlatformUnique combination of agentless CSPM capabilities with 2MB microagents providing comprehensive container security from registries to runtimeRapid Agentless Deployment with Attack Path AnalysisQuick deployment needs with contextual risk prioritization and minimal operational overheadWiz – CNAPP PlatformAgentless architecture deploys in minutes with Security Graph technology showing real attack paths and toxic risk combinationsMicrosoft Ecosystem IntegrationMicrosoft-centric environments requiring seamless integration with existing Azure investments and toolsMicrosoft – Defender for CloudNative integration across Microsoft security ecosystem with unified management for hybrid and multi-cloud environmentsComprehensive DevSecOps Integration with Regulatory ComplianceOrganizations with mature CI/CD pipelines requiring extensive policy libraries and compliance automationFidelis Security – Halo® PlatformDirect integration with Chef, Puppet, Terraform, Jenkins plus tens of thousands of policies for CIS benchmarks, PCI DSS, SOC 2, GDPR complianceAI-Driven Risk Prioritization with Code-to-Cloud ProtectionEnterprises seeking AI-powered insights and comprehensive development lifecycle securityPalo Alto Networks – Prisma CloudAI-powered risk prioritization with Prisma Cloud Copilot and code-to-cloud platform securing apps from design to runtimeIdentity-Centric Security with Endpoint IntegrationOrganizations requiring unified protection across identity, endpoint, and cloud with real-time breach detectionCrowdStrike – Falcon Cloud SecurityIndustry-first USPM combining ASPM, DSPM, and AI-SPM with cross-domain visibility leveraging Falcon EDR sensor and threat intelligence from 257 adversary groups

Fidelis Halo® Cloud Security Implementation Guide

Implementation Success Factors

Business Alignment Criteria

Multi-cloud strategy compatibility:

Developer workflow integration:

Measurable Success Metrics

Making Your Final Decision

The best CNAPP vendors for your organization depend on three critical evaluation factors:

Start with proof-of-concept deployments from 2-3 vendors that align with your primary security capabilities requirements. Leading platforms like Fidelis Security’s Halo® platform offer trial deployments that demonstrate deployment speed, comprehensive visibility quality, and security team integration effectiveness.

The key differentiator lies in selecting platforms that genuinely consolidate security functions rather than simply repackaging traditional security tools. Organizations investing in the right application protection platform CNAPP are experiencing reduced operational overhead, enhanced threat intelligence capabilities, and streamlined compliance management across cloud environments.

The right cloud native application protection platform transforms how organizations approach cloud security, providing unified platform capabilities needed to secure cloud native technologies throughout their lifecycle while eliminating security gaps and security risks across cloud infrastructure. Success comes from choosing comprehensive, genuinely integrated CNAPP solutions that enable security teams to protect cloud native applications effectively without compromising business agility.

Frequently Ask Questions

How do I migrate from traditional security tools to a CNAPP without disrupting operations?

Begin with proof-of-concept deployments in non-critical environments while your existing tools continue protecting production workloads. Running both systems in parallel for 30-60 days works well—this gives you time to understand the new platform without risking operational stability. Focus initially on areas where current tools show gaps, particularly container security or multi-cloud visibility challenges.

Start with a single cloud provider or one business unit before expanding coverage. Organizations consistently find gradual migration more successful than attempting wholesale replacement. This approach also helps build internal confidence and expertise before tackling mission-critical systems.

What are the most common CNAPP implementation challenges and how can they be avoided?

Three issues frequently derail CNAPP projects: unrealistic expectations about immediate returns, disconnect between development and security teams, and underestimating the time needed for policy customization.

Address these by bringing DevOps into vendor discussions from the beginning—not after security has already made decisions. Establish success metrics that both teams care about, and realistically plan 4-6 weeks minimum for policy tuning. Companies that make CNAPP selection a collaborative decision between security and development see significantly better adoption outcomes.

Do I need specialized staff or training to manage a CNAPP solution effectively?

This largely depends on your team’s existing cloud security experience. Teams currently handling CSPM or CWPP tools typically adapt to consolidated platforms without major difficulties. But if you’re transitioning from mostly on-premises security, expect a learning curve.

The most effective approach involves designating 1-2 people as CNAPP specialists who then train others internally. Test vendor training quality during your evaluation phase—there’s real variation in training effectiveness between providers. For teams lacking API integration or policy-as-code experience, factor professional services into your cost planning.

The post Top CNAPP Vendors and Which One Should You Pick appeared first on Fidelis Security.

Categories

No Responses

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *