When the world faced COVID-19, I watched something remarkable happen. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, which I had once viewed as tools of research and efficiency, suddenly became instruments of survival. They modelled outbreaks, predicted surges and accelerated vaccine research. Yet at the same time, I witnessed another silent battle unfold a digital one. Health organizations, research institutions and even vaccine supply chains became targets of cyberattacks. For me, it was a turning point that reinforced a simple truth: AI cannot strengthen public health without cybersecurity at its core.
Over the years, working at the intersection of data, AI and cloud security for healthcare and life sciences organizations, I’ve seen how transformative intelligent systems can be. But I’ve also seen how fragile they are when trust, data integrity and governance are not built into their foundation. Today, as countries prepare for future pandemics, we must treat cybersecurity not as a support function but as a critical enabler of readiness. The success of future pandemic preparedness will depend on whether we build trustworthy, secure and ethical AI systems from the ground up.
The expanding digital frontline
AI-driven pandemic preparedness depends on vast data ecosystems from genomic sequencing labs and hospital networks to connected sensors that monitor population health trends. These systems exchange millions of data points each hour, enabling faster decisions. But every connected device, every model training pipeline and every data integration point expands the attack surface.
In one of my engagements, public health models were trained using de-identified patient data, IoT feeds and cloud-based analytics. The security challenge was immediate: multiple entry points, distributed teams and differing compliance standards. In such ecosystems, a small misconfiguration an unsecured API or an outdated firmware could expose entire datasets. During the pandemic, these vulnerabilities were exploited at scale. Cybercriminals targeted vaccine research, contact tracing platforms and national health dashboards. It became clear that pandemic preparedness now has a digital dimension as critical as epidemiological preparedness itself.
The unique vulnerabilities of AI systems
Traditional security frameworks are not enough for AI. Attacks on algorithms take subtler forms. I often explain to my clients that when you corrupt data, you corrupt intelligence. Data poisoning occurs when malicious data is inserted into the training process, teaching the AI to make wrong decisions later. Imagine an outbreak prediction model fed with falsified data that underestimates transmission in one region, this could delay interventions and cost lives.
Another subtle but dangerous threat is model inversion, where attackers reverse-engineer AI outputs to infer private information about patients or study participants. In healthcare, this isn’t just a technical issue, it’s an ethical one. People trust that their health data will never re-identify them.
And then there are adversarial attacks carefully crafted manipulations that cause AI models to misclassify or ignore patterns. A small perturbation in sensor data could make an outbreak detection algorithm miss early warning signals. These are not theoretical risks, they are realities that cybersecurity teams are already mitigating daily.
Designing trustworthy AI ecosystems
The systems I help design today for pharmaceutical analytics or public health modeling follow one guiding principle: security by design, not as an afterthought. This begins with a zero-trust architecture assuming every connection, user or system could be compromised until proven otherwise. Role-based access controls, network segmentation and identity verification are now foundational practices.
I also emphasize data provenance, maintaining a traceable chain of custody for every piece of data that enters or leaves a pipeline. This allows us to validate sources, detect tampering and maintain confidence in the insights AI produces. Encryption (both at rest and in transit) is standard, but we also implement differential privacy and homomorphic encryption when dealing with highly sensitive medical or genomic data. These methods allow analysis without exposing personal details an elegant balance between innovation and ethics.
Model governance is another pillar. Every AI model must have version control, validation sandboxes and rollback capabilities. Before any deployment, we simulate possible adversarial attacks and test recovery procedures. I’ve learned that cybersecurity in AI is not just about defense; it’s about resilience, the ability to detect, isolate and recover without losing functionality during crises.
Ethics, governance and the elements of human trust
Technology alone cannot protect public health. Trust is built through ethics and transparency. I often remind data teams that behind every dataset lies a patient, a family or a community. In pandemic situations, public trust determines whether people comply with digital contact tracing, share health information or follow AI-guided advisories.
This is why ethical governance must go hand-in-hand with cybersecurity. AI systems should be explainable, auditable and accountable. Stakeholders from governments to citizens deserve to know how models make decisions, how data is protected and who has access. Regulations such as HIPAA, GDPR and emerging AI governance frameworks are not hurdles; they are guardrails that preserve integrity in moments of crisis.
International cooperation also plays a defining role. The WHO’s Global Strategy on Digital Health calls for digital solidarity, while the NIST AI Risk Management Framework offers a structured approach to assessing and mitigating AI-related risks. Aligning with these standards helps harmonize cybersecurity practices across borders a necessity, since pandemics and cyber threats recognize none.
Lessons from the pandemic era: Cybersecurity as preparedness
COVID-19 was a wake-up call in more ways than one. Alongside the biological virus, we faced a wave of ransomware, phishing and misinformation attacks that disrupted hospitals and vaccine logistics. I remember reviewing security reports where health data breaches increased by nearly 50% in the early months of 2021. Those of us working on cloud architecture and analytics pipelines suddenly had to think beyond performance, we had to think about resilience under attack.
The experience reshaped my approach to digital health. We now conduct joint drills between epidemiology teams and cybersecurity engineers, simulating not only outbreak scenarios but also cyber incidents. This multidisciplinary collaboration ensures that both biological and digital emergencies are met with preparedness, not panic.
Experts at the World Economic Forum describe the growing risk of a “cyber pandemic,” where digital contagion spreads faster than any biological one. I share this concern. Our increasing dependence on AI-based systems means a well-coordinated cyberattack could paralyze response operations during an actual health emergency. It is not enough to develop smart systems; we must make them secure and adaptable.
Moving forward: The road ahead – security by intelligence
Looking ahead, I believe the next phase of pandemic preparedness must embrace a security-by-intelligence mindset where AI protects itself using AI. Machine learning can detect anomalies, identify suspicious access patterns and predict potential vulnerabilities before exploitation. We are beginning to see cybersecurity evolve from a reactive function into an intelligent, adaptive shield for public health infrastructure.
Yet technology is only as effective as the people behind it. Training healthcare professionals to recognize phishing attempts, securing endpoint devices and conducting cyber hygiene education must become as routine as infection-control drills. Every clinician, data engineer and policymaker has a role to play.
My advice to organizations embarking on digital health transformation is simple: embed cybersecurity from day one. Treat your data pipeline as a clinical asset, it deserves the same rigor as a vaccine trial or a diagnostic protocol. The systems that save lives must be resilient against those who would exploit them.
Resilience as the true measure of readiness
Pandemic preparedness in the age of AI is no longer about who develops the fastest algorithm but who builds the most trustworthy ecosystem. As a data and cybersecurity architect in healthcare, I have witnessed that true innovation lies in resilience systems that continue to protect and perform even when threatened.
The next global health emergency will test not only our biological defences but also our digital fortifications. To succeed, cybersecurity must evolve from being a compliance checkbox to becoming the moral and operational foundation of digital health.
When the next outbreak comes and it will, our response must be dual: biological immunity and digital integrity. The AI that protects humanity must never be turned against it. That is the essence of preparedness — and the promise of a safer, smarter and more secure future for global health.
This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?
No Responses