You face more signals than your SOC can triage and more lateral movement than your legacy rules can see. Signature-only controls miss new techniques, while manual triage slows response.
The gap between “alert created” and “incident contained” widens when you can’t separate real risk from noise. Adversaries exploit encrypted channels, low-and-slow exfiltration, and living-off-the-land tools that look like normal activity. Missed weak signals become major incidents.
You accelerate detection and response with machine learning that understands normal, spots meaningful deviations, correlates signals across the kill chain, and drives automated actions. In practice, that means adopting an NDR approach where models learn your traffic, surface high-fidelity anomalies, and prioritize what you must handle now.
Why does machine learning matter for NDR right now—and what risks do you miss without it?
1. You need detection that evolves faster than attacker tradecraft
Traditional rules detect what you already know. Adversaries iterate faster, mixing new command-and-control patterns, fileless techniques, and toolchains that blend into routine network use. If you only look for known bad, you react too late. Machine learning in threat detection and response learns normal behavior for your environment and flags departures as they emerge.
You gain coverage for novel exfil paths, unusual SaaS destinations, and rare protocol abuse that signatures ignore.
You shorten the “unknown unknowns” window by promoting truly unusual sequences into your queue.
Pro tip: Use models that consider sequence and timing, not just point-in-time anomalies. A strange destination may be benign; a strange destination after a privilege change is not.
2. Encrypted and east-west traffic demand behavior, not just content
You inspect less plaintext every quarter. TLS everywhere makes payload inspection harder, and east-west movement pivots inside your trust boundary. Network anomaly detection with machine learning focuses on flow dynamics, session structure, metadata richness, and behavioral baselines even when content is opaque.
You catch off-hours data bursts, abnormal handshake patterns, or atypical inter-service chatter.
You spot lateral movement when internal hosts communicate in ways your environment rarely sees.
Pro tip: Build baselines per segment and per role. Treat a finance workstation chatting with an engineering build server as inherently suspicious, regardless of payload visibility.
3. Your SOC must prioritize with context, not volume
Alert floods burn analysts. Machine learning for SOC operations ranks events by risk, using features like asset criticality, user role, data sensitivity, and sequence correlation.
You route decisive work to the front of the line and auto-suppress repetitive low-value noise.
You cut MTTR because analysts start with enriched, contextualized alerts rather than raw logs.
Pro tip: Tie model outputs to clear analyst actions (“isolate host,” “re-auth user,” “collect memory”). Decision friction kills speed.
4. You need predictive threat detection to shrink dwell time
Threats leave weak signals before damage. Predictive models forecast likely next steps—exfil after staging, C2 after persistence—and help you interdict earlier.
You move from “detect and clean up” to “predict and prevent.”
You reduce blast radius by containing during setup, not after loss.
Pro tip: Feed closed-loop outcomes (true/false positives) back into models weekly. Fresh labels keep predictions sharp.
Post-Breach Detection
and Response
Shift to Detection and Response
Rich Metadata from NTA and EDR
Rise of Deception Defense
How do you operationalize machine learning in NDR without adding noise?
1. Collect the right signal, then enrich it
Start with broad network visibility (north-south and east-west) and consistent metadata (JA3/JA4 fingerprints, SNI, DNS, HTTP, TLS telemetry, file and session attributes). Enrich with identity, asset criticality, and data classification. You give models the context they need to separate benign anomalies from emerging threats.
Prioritize sources your analysts already trust.
Normalize early; consistent fields keep models stable.
Checklist:
North-south + east-west visibility
Identity and role linkage
Asset criticality and data sensitivity tags
Retention tuned for seasonal patterns
2. Baseline behavior by role, segment, and application
Models must learn “normal” per cohort: finance laptops, CI/CD agents, database subnets, partner VPNs. You reduce false positives by comparing like with like.
Capture seasonality (quarter-end spikes, code freezes).
Track rare but legitimate flows and mark them as approved exceptions.
Pro tip: Build allow-lists for scheduled transfers and maintenance windows so models ignore noise and spotlight out-of-band behavior.
3. Design model governance and drift control from day one
You keep trust high by measuring precision/recall, reviewing feature importance, and watching for drift. Establish thresholds for auto-containment vs. human review.
Publish model cards (purpose, inputs, limits) to your SOC runbook.
Retrain on a set cadence; hot-fix with incremental learning when patterns shift suddenly (e.g., a new SaaS rollout).
Checklist:
Metrics: alert quality, MTTR, analyst touch time
Retrain cadence and rollback plan
Human-in-the-loop gates for destructive actions
4. Embed models into repeatable SOC workflows
Models that don’t trigger consistent action just add tickets. Wire detections into playbooks that: collect more evidence, re-challenge identity, isolate a host, or block an egress path.
Use tiered responses by risk score.
Log every automated step for audit.
Pro tip: Start with “assistive automation” (enrich, correlate, pivot) before “active automation” (contain, kill). Expand as confidence grows.
A quick comparison to align teams
AreaBefore ML-Driven NDRWith ML-Driven NDR
TriageVolume-based, first-in-first-outRisk-ranked, context-richDetectionKnown-bad signatures onlyBehavioral + predictive patternsEast-WestSparse visibilityCohort baselines, lateral movement cluesResponseManual, inconsistentPlaybook-driven, tiered automationLearningAd hocClosed-loop, weekly model tuning
How does Fidelis NDR put machine learning to work so you detect earlier and respond faster?
1. Deep Session Inspection plus behavior models: see the whole conversation, not just packets
Fidelis NDR uses Deep Session Inspection (DSI) to reassemble and decode full sessions across protocols, then applies behavior analytics to spot threats spread over multi-packet flows. You catch exfiltration sequences, staged payload delivery, and protocol abuse that evade shallow inspection. This combination improves fidelity when traffic is complex or partially encrypted. You identify anomalies that manifest only across the entire exchange.
You speed investigations with session-level context, not isolated events.
Action: Tune policy to escalate DSI-flagged anomalies involving sensitive assets.
Content Inspection
Content Identification
Full Session Reassembly
Protocol and Application Decoding
2. Multi-context anomaly detection: external, internal, protocol, data movement, and event
Fidelis NDR’s anomaly framework evaluates five contexts—external north-south flows, internal east-west communications, application-protocol behavior, data movement patterns, and event correlation—so you surface the right outliers in the right place. You reduce noise and reveal lateral movement and exfiltration routes earlier.
External context: C2 patterns, unusual destinations. Internal context: rare peer-to-peer links, privilege-pivot paths. Protocol context: malformed or abused protocol behaviors. Data movement: off-hours spikes, atypical repositories. Event context: fusing rules/signatures with behavior to raise confidence.
Action: Review cohort baselines quarterly to keep contexts aligned with business changes.
3. Cyber terrain mapping, visibility, and faster detection
Fidelis NDR maps your “cyber terrain”—assets, relationships, and communication paths—to assign risk and highlight likely attack routes. The platform emphasizes full visibility of data in motion and advertises materially faster post-breach detection (when deployed as part of the Fidelis approach). You gain a prioritized view of what matters and catch risky behavior other tools miss.
You see which assets talk, when, and why—so deviations stand out. You use risk cues to triage faster and contain earlier.
Action: Tag sensitive data flows (finance, IP, regulated) so terrain analytics weight them higher.
4. Deception integrated with detection to raise signal quality
Fidelis integrates deception so you plant realistic decoys and honey tokens across the environment. When a user or process touches a decoy, you gain a high-confidence indicator and feed that signal into the same response engine. This removes ambiguity and deters probing.
You convert “maybe” into “act now” when decoys fire. You gather intent evidence without monitoring intrusive content.
Action: Place decoys near high-value subnets and crown-jewel repositories to detect staging early.
5. Network DLP, sandboxing, and inspection depth for content-aware detections
Beyond behavior, Fidelis NDR applies network data loss prevention and sandboxing alongside DSI. You unpack embedded files, analyze suspicious objects, and block exfil routes tied to sensitive content—all while models score behavior around those transfers. This dual lens (content + behavior) improves precision and reduces false positives.
You detect data theft attempts even when attackers fragment or embed payloads. You corroborate anomalous flows with content signals to justify containment.
Action: Align DLP dictionaries with legal and compliance terms; revisit quarterly.
6. Automated, risk-tiered response across the platform
As part of the Fidelis Elevate approach, detections can trigger automated actions and orchestrated responses across your environment—isolating devices, re-challenging identity, or collecting forensics—so you compress time to contain without waiting on manual steps. You maintain auditability with clear playbooks and outcomes.
You eliminate lag between high-confidence detection and first containment. You preserve evidence for post-incident analysis and model feedback.
Action: Start with alert-driven evidence collection, then graduate to containment for top-tier risk scores.
What should your first 90 days look like?
Week 1–2: Establish visibility and context Mirror north-south and east-west traffic. Onboard identity, asset tags, and data-classification sources. Define “crown jewels” and sensitive pathways.
Week 3–4: Baselines and early wins Build cohort baselines (role, segment, application). Whitelist scheduled maintenance transfers. Pilot auto-enrichment playbooks (e.g., whois, DNS history, identity lookups).
Week 5–8: Automation with guardrails Introduce conditional access prompts for high-risk anomalies. Automate packet/session capture on critical alerts. Add deception in high-value subnets.
Week 9–12: Governance and scale Publish model cards and performance metrics. Expand playbooks to isolation for top 5% risk scores. Schedule quarterly baseline reviews and deception tune-ups.
Accelerate what matters, ignore what doesn’t
You win when you elevate signal and compress response. Machine learning threat detection pinpoints true anomalies, ranks them by business risk, and predicts next moves so you act before damage. When you operationalize models with clear baselines, context, governance, and playbooks, your SOC moves faster with higher confidence. Fidelis NDR brings Deep Session Inspection, multi-context anomaly detection, cyber terrain mapping, deception integration, content analysis, and orchestrated response together so you detect earlier and contain faster—without drowning your analysts in noise. That’s how you shift from chasing alerts to controlling outcomes.
The post How Does Fidelis NDR Use Machine Learning to Detect Threats Earlier and Respond Faster? appeared first on Fidelis Security.
No Responses