{"id":7192,"date":"2026-02-19T14:09:10","date_gmt":"2026-02-19T14:09:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/?p=7192"},"modified":"2026-02-19T14:09:10","modified_gmt":"2026-02-19T14:09:10","slug":"a-deep-dive-into-fidelis-network-deception-features-and-what-they-mean-for-security-teams","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/?p=7192","title":{"rendered":"A Deep Dive into Fidelis Network Deception Features and What They Mean for Security Teams"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFidelis Network Deception helps detect attackers earlier by using realistic decoys and deception technology within enterprise networks.<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIntegration with existing security ecosystems improves investigation speed and reduces operational complexity for SOC teams.<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tHigh-confidence alerts from deception interactions help reduce alert fatigue and strengthen threat prioritization.<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCyber deception ROI typically comes from faster detection, improved visibility, and reduced incident response effort.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Security teams today are not failing because they lack tools. Most organizations already have firewalls, EDR, SIEM, cloud monitoring, and multiple detection layers. Yet attackers still manage to enter networks, stay hidden, and move laterally before detection. That gap between entry and detection is the real challenge.<\/p>\n

This creates pressure for CISOs and SOC leaders. Analysts deal with alert fatigue, unclear signals, and limited time. When alerts are uncertain, response slows. And when response slows, business risk increases. Security teams want clearer signals, earlier detection, and measurable cyber deception ROI \u2014 not just more alerts.<\/p>\n

This is where cyber deception<\/a> and network detection strategies are gaining attention. Platforms like Fidelis Network Deception combine deception technology with network detection<\/a> visibility so teams can expose attackers earlier, integrate insights into existing workflows, and make security operations more efficient.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Why Are Security Teams Evaluating Cyber Deception Alongside Traditional Security Tools?<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Many organizations are not replacing existing tools. They are strengthening detection confidence. Cyber deception fills visibility gaps<\/a> that traditional tools sometimes miss, especially during reconnaissance and lateral movement phases.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Reason #1: Detection gaps in modern enterprise environments<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Traditional detection tools focus on prevention or anomaly detection<\/a>. That works well for known threats or obvious deviations. But modern attackers intentionally blend with normal operations. They use legitimate credentials, approved admin tools, and encrypted channels. This makes malicious activity harder to distinguish from routine operations.<\/p>\n

For example, if an attacker logs in using stolen credentials, endpoint or SIEM alerts may not trigger immediately. The activity looks legitimate. But if that attacker touches a deception credential or decoy asset, intent becomes clear instantly. That is where deception technology<\/a> adds value.<\/p>\n

Security teams are recognizing that visibility must extend beyond prevention. Detection must identify intent, not just anomalies. This is particularly important in hybrid cloud environments where network boundaries are less defined.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

What security teams usually gain here:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tClearer early indicators of attacker reconnaissance instead of waiting for obvious compromise signals<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReduced uncertainty during investigations because deception alerts typically indicate real intent<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBetter ability to detect credential misuse, which is now a dominant attack technique <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Reason #2: Need for proactive threat exposure rather than reactive monitoring<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Most traditional security monitoring is reactive. It alerts after suspicious activity occurs. But attackers often operate quietly before triggering alerts. They map networks, identify high-value systems, and escalate privilege<\/a>s gradually.<\/p>\n

Cyber deception flips that model. Instead of waiting, you create controlled traps that attackers interact with during reconnaissance. If they explore, they expose themselves. This shortens detection timelines significantly.<\/p>\n

Think of it like this: if you only monitor production assets, you may miss early exploration. If you place believable decoys, attackers reveal themselves sooner. That gives defenders time.<\/p>\n

Alternatives like manual threat hunting help, but they require constant analyst effort. Deception automates early exposure continuously.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Practical benefits security teams report:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tEarlier detection<\/a> of stealth attacks before data access occurs<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFaster SOC response because alerts carry higher confidence<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReduced investigative workload due to clearer threat signals<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Reason #3: Increasing demand for measurable cyber deception ROI<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Security budgets are under scrutiny. Leaders need evidence that new investments reduce risk or operational effort. Cyber deception ROI often comes from operational efficiency rather than direct revenue impact.<\/p>\n

For example, if analysts spend less time validating alerts, productivity improves. Faster detection reduces breach remediation costs. Reduced dwell time<\/a> lowers potential data loss.<\/p>\n

Fidelis Network Deception supports this by combining deception technology with network detection insights. That helps quantify impact through metrics like MTTR reduction, alert confidence improvement, and investigation speed.<\/p>\n

Organizations evaluating deception platforms increasingly focus on ROI alignment with risk reduction.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Key ROI indicators security leaders track:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReduction in false positive<\/a> investigations<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFaster detection and containment timelines<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tImproved visibility across hybrid network environments<\/a><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Boost Your NDR: How Deception Supercharges Threat Detection & Response<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tExpanding Threat Landscape & SOC Challenges<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWhy NDR Alone Isn\u2019t Enough<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tHow Network Deception works and use case<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDownload the Whitepaper Now!<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

How Do Fidelis Network Deception Features Strengthen Security Operations?<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Once organizations understand deception\u2019s value, they evaluate specific platforms. Fidelis Network Deception stands out mainly because it integrates deception with network detection visibility rather than offering isolated traps.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

# Step 1: Realistic deception asset deployment across enterprise environments<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Fidelis deploys decoys, lures, credentials, and digital artifacts designed to look authentic inside enterprise environments. These assets mimic production systems closely enough that attackers interact with them naturally during reconnaissance<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Before deployment, the platform maps the cyber terrain<\/a>. It identifies critical assets, common attack paths, and likely reconnaissance targets. This ensures deception placement aligns with real risk, not guesswork.<\/p>\n

For example, if privileged credentials are frequently targeted, deception credentials may be strategically placed in memory, configuration files, or network locations that attackers typically explore.<\/p>\n

This approach increases effectiveness compared to static honeypots, which attackers often recognize quickly.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Operational value security teams typically see:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tEarlier visibility into attacker reconnaissance behavior<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tImproved understanding of how attackers move inside networks<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReduced risk of attackers reaching real critical assets undetected<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

# Step 2: Integration with existing security systems and detection workflows<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

One major evaluation question is integration. Security teams rarely want standalone tools that create additional operational silos. Fidelis deception<\/a> integrates with broader detection ecosystems, including SIEM, XDR, and network detection workflows.<\/p>\n

This means deception alerts can feed existing incident response processes<\/a>. Analysts do not need entirely new workflows. Instead, they gain stronger context within familiar tools.<\/p>\n

Integration also improves correlation. Network telemetry, endpoint signals, and deception alerts together create clearer incident narratives. This reduces investigation time.<\/p>\n

From an operational perspective, this is often where Fidelis Network Deception delivers practical value. It enhances existing investments rather than replacing them.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Integration benefits typically include:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tUnified threat visibility across network, endpoint, and deception layers<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFaster incident triage because alerts arrive with contextual data<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReduced operational friction for SOC teams already managing multiple tools<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

#Step 3: Improved threat investigation clarity and response speed<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

One consistent benefit reported with deception technology is investigation clarity. Traditional alerts often require validation before escalation. Deception alerts usually indicate direct interaction with controlled assets.<\/p>\n

This changes how analysts work. Instead of asking whether an alert is real, they focus on scope and containment. That reduces response time significantly.<\/p>\n

For example, if a decoy database is accessed, analysts immediately investigate credential exposure and lateral movement<\/a>. They do not waste time validating whether the alert matters.<\/p>\n

Combined with Fidelis network detection visibility, analysts can reconstruct attacker behavior faster. That improves response effectiveness.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Security operations improvements often include:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFaster identification of compromised systems<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReduced investigation uncertainty during incidents<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStronger collaboration between SOC, threat hunting<\/a>, and incident response teams<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Can Fidelis Network Deception Be Integrated With Existing Security Systems?<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

This is one of the most searched evaluation questions. Integration determines operational success. Most organizations already have established detection and response workflows.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Alignment with SIEM, XDR, and network detection ecosystems<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Fidelis deception capabilities are designed to work within broader security ecosystems rather than operate independently. Alerts and telemetry can integrate into SIEM or extended detection platforms, supporting centralized visibility.<\/p>\n

This improves correlation across multiple detection layers. Analysts see deception alerts alongside endpoint, network, and cloud signals. That provides context quickly.<\/p>\n

Integration also helps reporting. Security leaders can measure effectiveness across combined detection strategies. That supports strategic planning.<\/p>\n

Organizations evaluating integration usually prioritize minimal workflow disruption.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Key integration advantages include:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tConsistent incident response processes without major workflow changes<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tEnhanced cross-platform threat correlation<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tImproved reporting and visibility for leadership teams<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Operational workflow continuity for SOC teams<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

SOC teams often resist tools that require entirely new processes. Fidelis Network Deception aims to fit into existing operational workflows. Analysts can incorporate deception alerts without redesigning response playbooks.<\/p>\n

This continuity reduces adoption friction. Training requirements remain manageable. Operational efficiency improves faster.<\/p>\n

For example, deception alerts can trigger automated response workflows within existing SOAR platforms. That accelerates containment.<\/p>\n

This practical integration focus often influences platform selection.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Operational improvements security teams highlight:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMinimal disruption during adoption phases<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFaster SOC onboarding compared to standalone tools<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tImproved automation opportunities within existing response frameworks<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Scalability across hybrid and critical infrastructure environments<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Many organizations operate hybrid infrastructures combining on-prem, cloud, and operational technology environments. Network deception platforms must scale across these diverse environments.<\/p>\n

Fidelis Network Deception supports hybrid deployments, making it relevant for sectors like finance, healthcare, telecom, and energy. These industries require visibility without operational disruption.<\/p>\n

Scalability also supports future growth. As infrastructure evolves, deception coverage must adapt.<\/p>\n

This flexibility strengthens long-term ROI.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Deployment benefits commonly noted:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tConsistent detection coverage across hybrid environments<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReduced visibility gaps during infrastructure expansion<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStronger protection for critical infrastructure systems<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Final Thought: What Should Security Teams Take Away About Fidelis Network Deception?<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Cyber deception is no longer experimental. It is becoming part of layered detection strategies. Security teams are moving toward proactive threat exposure rather than waiting for obvious compromise signals.<\/p>\n

Fidelis Network Deception combines deception technology with network detection visibility. This helps teams detect earlier, reduce uncertainty, and integrate insights into existing workflows. The focus is better signals, not more alerts.<\/p>\n

For organizations evaluating network deception platforms for critical infrastructure or enterprise security operations, the key considerations remain integration, operational efficiency, and measurable cyber deception ROI.<\/p>\n

And ultimately, stronger visibility leads to better security decisions. If you want to see how deception fits into your environment, consider scheduling a demo or contacting the team to explore how it can strengthen your security operations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Experience how Deep Session Inspection uncovers Hidden Threats <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tVisualize attacker movement across the network <\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDetect encrypted and evasive activity <\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAutomate responses with precision <\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIntegrated Deception<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWatch the Demo<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The post A Deep Dive into Fidelis Network Deception Features and What They Mean for Security Teams<\/a> appeared first on Fidelis Security<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Key Takeaways Fidelis Network Deception helps detect attackers earlier by using realistic decoys and deception technology within enterprise networks. Integration with existing security ecosystems improves investigation speed and reduces operational complexity for SOC teams. High-confidence alerts from deception interactions help reduce alert fatigue and strengthen threat prioritization. Cyber deception ROI typically comes from faster detection, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":7193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7192"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7192\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}