If you\u2019ve been worried that a robot is going to take your job, you can probably relax. But you might want to prepare for your job to look very different.\u00a0<\/p>\n
According to Indeed\u2019s AI at Work Report 2025, AI is less about full-on replacement and more about a significant reshuffling of our daily tasks. The research, which analyzed nearly 2,900 different skills required in today\u2019s job market, stresses that this change doesn\u2019t mean mass replacement.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s about transformation, not elimination.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cThe real question is not whether GenAI will change jobs \u2014 it absolutely is, and will,\u201d the report states<\/a>. \u201cThe question is what kinds of jobs will be most and least changed, why, and how.\u201d<\/p>\n The study also found that:<\/p>\n 26% of jobs posted on Indeed in the past year are \u201chighly transformable.\u201d<\/p>\n Over half (54%) are \u201cmoderately\u201d exposed.<\/p>\n Only 1% of skills analyzed fell into the \u201cfull transformation\u201d category, where AI could theoretically perform the entire task without human input.<\/p>\n In most professions, the relationship is one of cooperation, not competition. The Indeed study describes this as \u201chybrid transformation,\u201d where \u201chuman oversight will remain critical when applying these skills, but GenAI can already perform a significant portion of routine work<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n Tech and finance professionals appear to be standing closest to AI\u2019s firing line.<\/p>\n \u201cThe jobs that are more likely to have a high degree of transformation are white-collar jobs,\u201d Indeed\u2019s Laura Ullrich said, according to CNBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n Roles that require cognitive reasoning, like coding, analysis, or writing, are most vulnerable. By contrast, jobs that depend heavily on physical presence or emotional interaction, such as nursing, manufacturing, and construction, are less likely to be disrupted.<\/p>\n The report shows that 81% of software development skills fall within the \u201chybrid transformation\u201d category, suggesting AI is now capable of handling much of the routine coding work.<\/p>\n One of the report\u2019s model assessments explained that AI can provide \u201cexplanations, code samples, debugging help, and architectural advice,\u201d signaling that while AI can assist, human oversight remains essential for accuracy and ethics.<\/p>\n At the other end of the spectrum, nursing and childcare roles remain the most shielded. These jobs rely on compassion, empathy, and human judgment \u2014 qualities still beyond AI\u2019s reach.<\/p>\n \u201cGenAI does not replace nurses, but has the potential to redistribute cognitive and administrative load, freeing time for patient-facing care,\u201d the Indeed report said. That redistribution could ease chronic staff shortages rather than cause layoffs.<\/p>\n Despite growing fears, experts say the disruption is gradual. The Yale University Budget Lab<\/a> recently reported that \u201cthe broader labor market has not experienced a discernible disruption since ChatGPT\u2019s release 33 months ago.\u201d<\/p>\n Still, AI is forcing companies to rethink how they organize work. Some firms are already making tough calls. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff recently admitted to cutting thousands of customer service roles because of AI<\/a>, saying, \u201cI\u2019ve reduced it from 9,000 heads to about 5,000, because I need less heads,\u201d as quoted by CNBC.<\/p>\n However, many economists believe the greater challenge will not be layoffs, but reskilling. The Indeed report emphasizes that real-world impact depends on \u201chow quickly workers are reskilled, and how job design evolves,\u201d as businesses adopt AI tools<\/a>. Those who learn to work with AI \u2014 not against it \u2014 are more likely to thrive in the next phase of the job market.\u00a0<\/p>\n The Indeed report aligns with a recent Microsoft study, which shows that <\/strong>writing and sales positions<\/strong><\/a> are most vulnerable to being replaced by AI.<\/strong><\/p>\n The post AI Isn\u2019t Stealing Your Job, It\u2019s Redefining It: New Report Shows Which Roles Are Changing Most<\/a> appeared first on eWEEK<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" If you\u2019ve been worried that a robot is going to take your job, you can probably relax. But you might want to prepare for your job to look very different.\u00a0 According to Indeed\u2019s AI at Work Report 2025, AI is less about full-on replacement and more about a significant reshuffling of our daily tasks. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5258"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Jobs in the crosshairs<\/h2>\n
The safest seats in the AI storm<\/h2>\n