{"id":3171,"date":"2025-05-14T13:04:49","date_gmt":"2025-05-14T13:04:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/?p=3171"},"modified":"2025-05-14T13:04:49","modified_gmt":"2025-05-14T13:04:49","slug":"how-deception-fits-into-zero-trust-and-mitre-shield-frameworks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/?p=3171","title":{"rendered":"How Deception Fits into Zero Trust and MITRE Shield Frameworks"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
A technical analysis of deception technology\u2019s role in modern cybersecurity frameworks<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

In today\u2019s evolving threat landscape, organizations are increasingly turning to advanced frameworks like Zero Trust and MITRE Shield to strengthen their security posture. Zero trust environments, with their emphasis on identity verification and micro-segmentation, play a crucial role in protecting sensitive data from insider threats and enabling early detection of compromised workstations. While these frameworks <\/span>provide<\/span> robust defensive capabilities, adding deception technology creates a more comprehensive security strategy that shifts advantage back to defenders. This technical blog examines how deception technology enhances these frameworks and <\/span>provides<\/span> practical implementation guidance.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

The Limitations of Traditional Security Approaches<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Traditional perimeter-based security, often referred to as perimeter defenses, <\/span>operates<\/span> on the outdated assumption that everything inside the network can be trusted. Once attackers breach that perimeter, they can move laterally with minimal resistance. Zero Trust architecture<\/a> addresses this by implementing \u201cnever trust, always verify\u201d principles, but even this advanced approach has limitations when attackers circumvent controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Deception Technology: Key Enhancements to Zero Trust<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Enhanced Continuous Visibility<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Zero Trust architecture depends on a comprehensive trust model that ensures visibility into the environment. Advanced deception platforms like Fidelis Deception<\/a> provide automated terrain mapping that continuously discovers, profiles, and assesses assets across hybrid environments. <\/span>Organizations often uncover previously unknown assets during deception technology deployment, thanks to continuous terrain mapping and automated visibility capabilities. <\/span>This terrain mapping capability serves as a foundation for both creating convincing deception layers and supporting Zero Trust implementation.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

High-Fidelity Post-Breach Detection <\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

The most significant contribution of deception technology to Zero Trust is generating high-confidence alerts with minimal false positives. Since legitimate users have no reason to interact with decoy assets, any interaction <\/span>indicates<\/span> potential malicious activity. Enterprise-grade solutions like Fidelis Deception deliver high-fidelity alerts from decoys, Active Directory credentials, poisoned data, and suspicious traffic, directly addressing one of security operations\u2019 biggest challenges: alert fatigue. While other security tools generate <\/span>numerous<\/span> alerts requiring investigation, deception triggers <\/span>almost always<\/span> represent<\/span> genuine threats requiring immediate response. This allows security teams to detect attacks and focus resources on actual threats rather than investigating false positives.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
Act Before They Breach: Discover How Deception Tilts the Advantage<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Get the technical blueprint to trap attackers early and reduce alert fatigue.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

What\u2019s Inside the Whitepaper?\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDeception v\/s Honeypots<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStrategies to Disrupt Lateral Movement<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStrategies to Reduce Dwell Time<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDownload the Whitepaper<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Disruption of Lateral Movement<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Zero Trust uses <\/span>microsegmentation<\/span> to prevent lateral movement, but deception technology adds another defensive layer by actively disrupting attackers when they manage to move laterally. Strategically placed deceptive artifacts like fake credentials and registry keys divert attackers, including those using stolen credentials, toward closely <\/span>monitored<\/span> decoys, keeping them away from valuable assets and providing security teams time to respond.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSuggested Reading: Deception for Lateral Movement Detection<\/a><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Practical Implementation of MITRE Shield with Deception Technology<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

MITRE Shield provides a framework for active defense, and deception technology <\/span>directly implements<\/span> many Shield tactics. Additionally, the MITRE Engage matrix connects various defensive techniques and tactics, enabling defenders to apply the <\/span>appropriate actions<\/span> based on their specific tactical <\/span>objectives<\/span> and to enhance their understanding of adversarial behavior during engagements. The table below shows how deception capabilities map to specific Shield tactics:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\tMITRE Shield TacticDeception ImplementationOperational Benefit\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\tChannelNetwork traffic redirection, breadcrumb placementControls adversary movement pathsCollectFull packet capture on decoys, memory forensicsRich intelligence on attacker TTPsContainIsolated deception networks, credential loopsPrevents access to critical assetsDetectDecoy access monitoring, credential usage alertsEarly warning with minimal false positivesDisruptResource-intensive decoys, misleading informationWastes attacker time and resourcesFacilitateSafe environment for threat hunting, TTP observationImproves security team capabilitiesLegitimizeDynamic asset emulation, real-time decoy updatesCreates convincing environmentsTestSecurity control validation, gap identificationContinuously improves security posture\t\t\t\t<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Modern deception platforms<\/a> automate deployment and management, providing high security value with minimal operational overhead.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Technical Implementation Strategy<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

A successful implementation of deception technology aligned with Zero Trust and MITRE Shield requires a structured approach:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Protecting identity stores is crucial in Zero Trust security architectures. Deploying identity-specific deceptions can effectively detect threats<\/a> and unauthorized access attempts related to these sensitive assets.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Step 1: Comprehensive Terrain Mapping<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Before deploying deception assets, automated discovery should map the entire corporate network environment, including:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tNetwork-based asset identification<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCloud resource enumeration <\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tService and application mapping<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tUser and access pattern analysis<\/a><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

This terrain mapping<\/a> provides the foundation for both Zero Trust segmentation and strategic deception deployment.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Step 2: Risk-Based Decoy Deployment<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Deception assets should be deployed strategically based on risk assessment:<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPosition decoys alongside high-value systems<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPlace breadcrumbs on likely attack paths<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDeploy deceptive credentials leading to monitored systems<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tEstablish decoy services mimicking production applications<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Modern deception technologies use machine learning to automate and adapt deployment of decoys and breadcrumbs based on asset risk, ensuring that threats do not reach or affect actual production assets. For example, Fidelis Deception creates decoys from real assets, emulated services, operating systems, containers, cloud assets, and enterprise IoT devices while continuously updating lures, breadcrumbs, and fake Active Directory accounts to <\/span>maintain<\/span> a realistic deception layer. In hybrid environments, this deception coverage must extend across traditional infrastructure, cloud services, containers, and IoT.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Step 3: Security Operations Integration<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Deception technology must integrate with broader security operations:<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIncorporate active defense actions to create a structured approach to defending against cyber threats<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFeed deception alerts into SIEM or XDR platforms<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tImplement automated response playbooks triggered by deception alerts <\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTrain analysts on deception alert investigation<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tUse deception intelligence<\/a> to enhance threat hunting<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

XDR Integration: Magnifying Detection Capabilities<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Integrating deception with Extended Detection and Response (XDR) platforms creates significant security advantages. This integration enables:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tEarlier breach detection through high-fidelity deception alerts<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tComprehensive attack chain visualization<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAutomated response to deception triggers<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tContinuous improvement of detection rules<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

XDR platforms provide the rich visibility needed to build better deception layers, while offering alerts, insights, and metadata for threat eradication and forensic analysis. While deception can function independently, unifying it with NDR and EDR within an XDR platform<\/a> delivers contextual visibility and integrated detection and response capabilities to <\/span>anticipate<\/span> and mitigate potential future attacks. Organizations implementing this integration have documented reductions in mean time to detect (MTTD) and decreased analyst investigation time due to the clarity of attack evidence provided by deception technology.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Industry-Specific Deception Strategies<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Cloud Environments<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Cloud deception strategies for zero trust deployment include:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCloud-native decoys with minimal resource consumption<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tServerless function decoys appearing as valuable assets <\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDeceptive cloud storage with monitored access<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFake cloud service accounts with alerting capabilities<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

These deception assets blend seamlessly with legitimate cloud resources while minimizing cloud spending.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Critical Infrastructure<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

For critical infrastructure protection, deception should focus on minimizing the blast radius of potential attacks by implementing:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tNetwork-based OT decoys at IT\/OT boundaries<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tControl system interface emulation <\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDeceptive credentials for administrative systems<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBreadcrumbs directing attackers away from critical operations<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Healthcare Environments<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Healthcare-specific deception includes:<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMedical device network monitoring<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tPatient data access deception<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAdministrative system decoys<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tProtection against lateral movement leading to ransomware deployment <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

With healthcare being heavily targeted for ransomware attacks and insider threats, early detection through deception has proven valuable for <\/span>maintaining<\/span> continuity of care.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Looking Ahead: Emerging Deception Technologies<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Recent advancements in deception technology include active defense based strategies that go beyond traditional methods of detecting and removing threats:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

AI-Enhanced Deception<\/span> \u2013 Machine learning is making deception more dynamic and convincing. Modern solutions use behavioral analysis to create realistic decoys and automatically adapt deception assets based on environment changes.<\/span>Cloud-Native Deception at Scale<\/span> \u2013 With accelerating cloud adoption, deception technology has evolved to become truly cloud-native, with lightweight, containerized decoys that spin up on demand.<\/span>Integrated Security Validation<\/span> \u2013 Deception increasingly serves a dual purpose: detecting attackers and validating security controls. By monitoring interactions with deception assets, organizations can continuously verify their Zero Trust implementations.<\/span>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

In today\u2019s sophisticated threat landscape, organizations need more than preventative security measures. Integrating deception technology with Zero Trust and MITRE Shield frameworks creates a robust security architecture that:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDetects breaches earlier with high-confidence alerts<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tProvides valuable intelligence about attacker techniques<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tActively disrupts attack operations<\/span><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tContinuously improves security posture<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Effective deception solutions<\/a> offer automated deployment and management with minimal operational overhead, while providing high-fidelity alerts that enable security teams to detect post-breach attacks earlier without false alarm noise. This integrated approach, incorporating applicable active defense information, shifts the advantage from attackers to defenders by increasing the cost and complexity of successful attacks while providing defenders with clear visibility into adversary activities. The resulting security architecture not only improves detection and response capabilities but also <\/span>establishes<\/span> a foundation for cyber resiliency that allows organizations to <\/span>maintain<\/span> operations even during active cyber events.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tExplore how Fidelis Deception can help you!\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tTalk to an expert\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The post How Deception Fits into Zero Trust and MITRE Shield Frameworks<\/a> appeared first on Fidelis Security<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A technical analysis of deception technology\u2019s role in modern cybersecurity frameworks In today\u2019s evolving threat landscape, organizations are increasingly turning to advanced frameworks like Zero Trust and MITRE Shield to strengthen their security posture. Zero trust environments, with their emphasis on identity verification and micro-segmentation, play a crucial role in protecting sensitive data from insider […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3171"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3171\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cybersecurityinfocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}